DONATE

ABOUT ANKUR SHARMA

President, Ekam Sanatan Bharat

Ankur Sharma was born in 1986 in the Kathua district of Jammu & Kashmir. Both his parents have worked with the State Government. He completed his schooling in Kathua. After finishing school, he went to Pune for higher studies, where he completed B.E. in Software Engineering ( I.T. ) from the University of Pune. He then secured a LLB
degree from the Faculty of Law, Delhi University. After obtaining a law degree, he started practicing in the Jammu and Kashmir High Court. As time progressed, Ankur Sharma began taking strong stand against many anti-Hindu laws legislated against the National interest. 

In 2014, he filed CMP-48 of 2014 in the Jammu and Kashmir High Court regarding the Rs 25,000 crore Land Scam related to the conferment of ownership rights of Government Lands. Under its aegis, Ankur Sharma requested the High Court to hand over the investigation of this scam to the CBI. And finally, in October 2020, while giving its verdict, the court handed over the investigation of this case to the CBI.

The land scam in Jammu and Kashmir was directly linked to the Land Jihad aimed at rapidly changing the Hindu majority Demography. And behind this was the Roshni Act of Jammu and Kashmir. Under the Roshni Act, there was a provision to give ownership rights to those who illegally occupied government land. This was a law intending the Islamization of Jammu and Kashmir

Challenging the constitutional validity of the Roshni Act, Ankur Sharma filed PIL 41/2014 in the Jammu wing of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court titled 'Ankur Sharma vs state of J&k and others'. This case also went on for 6 years and finally the decision came in favor of Ankur Sharma.

 ​​The Roshni Act was declared unconstitutional, and lands alloted in the act were ordered to be retrieved back.

ANKUR SHARMA CHALLENGING THE “MUSLIMS ARE A MINORITY IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR” STATUS

In June 2016, Ankur Sharma filed a PIL in the Supreme Court, in which he argued that Muslims constitute majority in Jammu and Kashmir, so they should not be given minority status (PIL 489/2016, Ankur Sharma Vs Union of India and Others).

In this case too, the decision went in favor of Ankur Sharma which ironically remains unimplemented on ground by the Central Govt, thanks to their policy of ‘Triptikaran’.

ANKUR SHARMA AGAINST STATE CONTROL OF HINDU TEMPLES

Ankur Sharma is contesting a case in J&K High Court challenging the state control of Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine. 

The BJP Govt representing the State has taken a stand that Hindus cannot be given control of Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine. The case is in its final stages of arguments before the High Court. 

Apart from this, awareness and mobilisation on the issue through Public meetings, protests is also something that cadres of IkkJutt Jammu Party are continuously engaged in.